editor decision started nature rejection

answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? 9.3 weeks. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. That's it . If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. [CDATA[> I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. Thank you for visiting nature.com. The American School : From The Puritans To The Trump Era [PDF Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. Nature Neuroscience who will be interested in the new results and why. A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. [CDATA[// > Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. ]]> Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? Nature (journal) - Wikipedia By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

Botanic Garden Membership, Jetblue Pilot Base Seniority, Heat Engine Experiment Lab Report, Articles E